Sexuele Voorlichting is a Dutch-language short film produced in Belgium in 1991. Directed by Ronald Deronge and written by André Singelijn, it was intended as a candid educational tool for preteens and teenagers navigating puberty. The film covers a wide range of topics, including the anatomical differences between boys and girls, the mechanics of erections and menstruation, masturbation, sexual intercourse, contraception, and childbirth.
There was a scene where a boy looked in the mirror, inspecting a pimple on his chin with horror. A girl in the video struggled to put on a training bra, the strap twisting. Sexuele Voorlichting is a Dutch-language short film produced
By contrast, sexual education for boys and girls in 2021 has undergone a radical transformation, driven by two forces: the recognition of affirmative consent and the rise of the internet. Unlike the top-down, expert-to-child model of 1991, modern puberty education (in progressive curricula like those updated by the WHO or the updated Dutch Springplannen ) is participatory. In 2021, a 12-year-old is likely to encounter information first through TikTok, Reddit, or YouTube influencers like Hannah Witton or Mama Doctor Jones before they hear it from a teacher. This decentralization is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it allows for niche discussions—asexuality, non-binary puberty, or the emotional labor of relationships—that were non-existent in 1991. On the other hand, it exposes adolescents to misogynistic "manosphere" content, unrealistic pornography acting as a defacto sex educator, and the pressure of performative sexuality on platforms like Instagram or Snapchat. There was a scene where a boy looked
Whether in 1991 or 2021, the core goal remains the same: to provide young people with accurate, reliable information to navigate their changing bodies and emotions safely and confidently. As society evolves, sexuele voorlichting must continue to adapt, ensuring it supports the mental, physical, and emotional health of all teenagers. If you're interested, I can also: from both eras. Unlike the top-down, expert-to-child model of 1991, modern
The film is frequently discussed on platforms like IMDb and Letterboxd due to its graphic nature, which many modern viewers find jarring for a program intended for teenagers.